Q The previous item in this module, ReflectiveLearning.pdf Actions , suggests two alternate ways of viewing our own progression in comprehension and skill development. The last line in the document presents a task: "Use Pappas’s and Tolisano’s taxonomies of reflection to help you reflect on your learning, growth and development as a reader, writer, and thinker in this course." Consider questions like these as you work: Do you feel that one or both of these models speaks to your progress in this course? Where would you have placed yourself on either scale at the beginning of the quarter? Here, at the end of the quarter? How might you use this same process to create writing in future courses or in your personal/professional life? This reflection should consist of 2-3 paragraphs of developed, edited prose. Make clear reference to one or both of the taxonomies in your reflection. Want to see a sample of what this submission might look like? View 2 samples available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aaNDu0nEMcuywp69y5hndjH6C4NfQ50-rc6UDS7Eglc/edit?usp=sharingLinks to an external site. Rubric Weekly Work Rubric - 25 points Weekly Work Rubric - 25 points Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion 25 pts Submission meets or exceeds assignment tasks. Generally well edited. Answers all questions fully and completely. 18.75 pts Submission meets basic assignment tasks. Submission answers all or most questions/tasks fully, but could use further elaboration for clarity. May not be well edited. OR, assignment was submitted past the original deadline and is eligible for a maximum score of 75%. 12.5 pts Submission doesn't meet basic assignment tasks, though attempts a response to the prompt. May not be well edited. May only answer a portion of the questions or be significantly short of length requirements. 0 pts Submission meets no assignment tasks. May be plagiarized. 25 pts Total Points: 25